I just had this conversation with a friend a month or two ago and we had a good chuckle.
I paid $17.50 for a McCartney concert in 1976. Fast forward 40+ years and people are willing to pay $500 for a voice that couldn't hit a high note if his life depended on it and a very subpar concert compared to what I saw for 3 1/2% of the cost.
Yeah, I know it's this nostalgia thing, but it still amazes me. Musicians are not like fine wine. They do not get better with time. His picture makes it seem like he'll need a walker to get on stage. Whatever. Knock yourself out if you want to pay it. It's your money.
I paid $17.50 for a McCartney concert in 1976. Fast forward 40+ years and people are willing to pay $500 for a voice that couldn't hit a high note if his life depended on it and a very subpar concert compared to what I saw for 3 1/2% of the cost.
Yeah, I know it's this nostalgia thing, but it still amazes me. Musicians are not like fine wine. They do not get better with time. His picture makes it seem like he'll need a walker to get on stage. Whatever. Knock yourself out if you want to pay it. It's your money.